70%
of the variance in employee engagement between teams is attributable to the manager. Which makes manager capability the highest leverage thing you own.
Gallup, State of the American Manager ↗The workshop went well. The feedback scores were good. Six weeks later nothing in any manager’s behavior has visibly changed, and the only artifact you have is an attendance list. Voohy is the practice layer that closes that gap, and it leaves behind a competency baseline you can trend.
One time passes · No auto renewal · No IT project
What a manager on your cohort practices
The Underperformer. Three sprints, three missed deadlines. Priya does not know why this meeting was booked.
Priya
Hey, you wanted to talk? Things have been hectic. What is on your mind?
You
Thanks for making time. The last three sprint deliverables landed after the deadline. I want to understand what is going on, and what I can take off your plate.
↳Named the pattern, not the person. Opened with curiosity and offered support in the same breath.
Priya
I did not realise it was that visible. I have been stuck on the new architecture and thought I should figure it out alone.
Strong session
Scored automatically, transcript stays private
✓ Made it safe to admit being stuck, which is the whole ballgame in a performance conversation.
✎ Never agreed what happens next. Close the loop with a specific commitment and a date.
You see the score. You never see the transcript.
The question you get asked
“So what did the L&D budget actually buy us?”
Attendance and satisfaction scores are not an answer to that question, and everyone in the room knows it. A movement in measured manager competency is.
01 / The problem
Manager quality moves engagement, burnout and regretted attrition more than any program you can fund. It is also the thing you have the least measurement on, because the only signals you get are lagging ones.
70%
of the variance in employee engagement between teams is attributable to the manager. Which makes manager capability the highest leverage thing you own.
Gallup, State of the American Manager ↗44%
of managers worldwide report ever receiving formal training for the role. The gap is not a nice to have. It is most of the population.
Gallup, State of the Global Workplace ↗25.5%
of tech workers rate their manager as highly effective. Manager effectiveness was the strongest driver of burnout in the dataset, ahead of role and company size.
Lenny’s Newsletter, 2026 survey ↗0.5 – 2×
annual salary to replace one employee. One badly handled manager relationship is a line item, and it lands in someone else’s budget, which is why it stays invisible.
Gallup on turnover cost ↗What you have today
What a practice layer gives you
02 / The dashboard
Not a completion percentage. A view of which managers are practicing, which competency is weak across the whole cohort, and who has quietly stopped.
Avg readiness
71
up 9 this quarter
Active, 7 days
14
of 18 managers
Sessions, 30 days
96
5.3 per manager
Certified
4
Practitioner track
Team skill heatmap
| Manager | Empathy | Clarity | Listening | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Okafor | 88 | 84 | 79 | 74 |
| M. Bianchi | 81 | 77 | 86 | 62 |
| S. Raman | 74 | 68 | 71 | 58 |
| A. Klein | 69 | 91 | 64 | 80 |
| J. Whitmore | 52 | 61 | 49 | 44 |
Resolution focus is weak down the entire column. That is a cohort problem you fix once, not five separate coaching conversations.
J. Whitmore has not practiced in 19 days and holds the lowest readiness on the team. That is a coaching conversation you would otherwise have discovered in an exit interview.
Illustrative dashboard, real feature set
What you do with it
A weak column across every manager is a curriculum decision. Assign the matching pack to all eighteen seats and watch the column move.
Low readiness plus nineteen days of silence is an early warning you can act on, weeks before it turns into a resignation or a grievance.
When exit interviews keep naming one manager, buy five seats and intervene there. You do not need a company wide rollout to fix a local problem.
Take a movement in measured competency to the board, not a satisfaction score from a workshop nobody remembers.
How the readiness score is built
Weighted, then capped by session count, so nobody posts a high readiness score off three lucky sessions. It rewards practicing a range of scenarios, recently and repeatedly. Which is exactly the behavior you want the number to drive.
03 / Rollout
The reason most L&D tools fail is not the content. It is that getting them deployed takes a quarter and three approvals.
Team plans from five to thirty seats on one time passes. No subscription, no auto renewal, no seat true up call later.
Email or bulk CSV. Managers accept and are practicing the same day. No SSO required below Enterprise.
Push a learning pack, a scenario or a certification track to every seat at once, with a due date. Overdue flags surface automatically.
Readiness, competency heatmap, session counts and completion, all exportable when someone asks what changed.
04 / Why practice
This is not a novel claim about a novel format. It is the oldest result in training research, and it is the reason the practice layer is the part worth buying.
Model the behavior, practice it, get feedback, repeat. A meta-analysis of 117 studies found that the knowledge gained this way decayed over time, exactly as your post workshop surveys suggest, but that the effects on skills and on actual job behavior held steady or kept improving.
Transfer was strongest under specific conditions: when trainees practiced scenarios drawn from their own work, when they saw the wrong way handled alongside the right way, and when goals were set. Those conditions describe a simulator far better than they describe a slide deck.
Taylor, Russ-Eft & Chan, A Meta-Analytic Review of Behavior Modeling Training, Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005 · Record
The idea is older than the software
“Microworlds [business simulators] enable managers and management teams to begin ‘learning through doing’ about their most important systemic issues.”
Peter M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline, MIT Sloan School of Management
Written in 1990. What got built afterwards simulated markets and systems. Nobody built the practice field for the conversation itself, which is where manager capability is actually made or lost.
05 / Questions
Something not answered here? Write to the founder directly. You will get a real answer from the person who built it, not a sales sequence.
[email protected] →Buy seats, invite by email or bulk CSV, then assign a learning pack, a scenario or a certification track to every seat at once with a due date. The dashboard shows seats used, average team readiness, active managers, a skill heatmap by competency, and per manager progress with overdue flags. There is no IT project and no SSO requirement below Enterprise.
Manager readiness per person, competency scores across empathy, clarity, active listening and resolution focus, session counts, scenario range, recency, completion against assigned tracks and certification attainment. All exportable. That is a behavior baseline you can trend across quarters rather than a completion percentage.
It is weighted: skill 40%, practice volume 20%, scenario diversity 15%, recency 15%, consistency 10%. It is then capped by session count, so nobody posts a high readiness score off three lucky sessions. It rewards practicing a range of scenarios, recently and repeatedly, which is exactly the behavior you want a number to drive.
No. Admins see readiness, scores, completion and AI summaries. Conversation transcripts stay private to the person who practiced. This is deliberate. People do not rehearse honestly when they believe the transcript is a performance management artifact, and dishonest practice is worthless practice.
No, it sits inside it. Programs teach the framework and coaching works on the individual. Voohy is the practice layer between sessions, which is the part that is usually missing and the reason so little transfers back to the job.
One time access passes rather than subscriptions, priced per seat, with team plans from five to thirty seats and Enterprise above that. No auto renewal and no seat true up call in month four. Enterprise adds SSO, custom scenario commissioning, invoice billing and annual contracts.
That is the main reason teams choose it. Every session is asynchronous and takes about twelve minutes, so there is no cohort start date, no scheduling and no travel. A manager in Berlin and one in Singapore run the same assigned track on their own time.
Take a walkthrough of the admin side, or run a scenario yourself first so you know exactly what you would be putting in front of your managers.
From 5 seats · One time passes · No auto renewal